Clyde Russell is a Reuters columnist. The views expressed are his own.
LAUNCESTON, Australia, Aug 18 (Reuters) – BHP Billiton’s plan to demerge its unwanted aluminium, nickel and manganese assets underscores just what a fantastic deal shareholders in the old Billiton got when the two joined in 2001.
When Australia-based BHP joined forces with the London-listed, but largely South African, Billiton, a diversified natural resources giant was created.
At the time it was largely viewed as a deal that favoured Billiton shareholders. BHP shareholders got about 58 percent of the merged entity, while Billiton’s got 42 percent, meaning that BHP paid about a 20 percent premium to Billiton shareholders, according to a March 19, 2001 report in the Wall Street Journal.
With the Aug. 15 news that BHP Billiton’s board favours a demerger, the 2001 deal comes full circle. While it’s unlikely to be an exact match, the bulk of assets proposed for the new spin-off company will be those that Billiton brought into the 2001 merger.
Billiton’s main assets in the 2001 merger were the Hillside and Bayside aluminium smelters in Richards Bay on South Africa’s east coast, the Mozal smelter in neighbouring Mozambique, and energy coal mines in South Africa.