http://www.lawyersweekly.ca/index.php?section=main
Superior Court provides guidance for rights of first refusal agreements
A major commercial law ruling from Ontario holds useful lessons for the mining industry and other sectors that incorporate rights of first refusal into joint venture or shareholder agreements, counsel say.
The case pitted two Canadian mining giants, Barrick Gold Corp. of Toronto against Vancouver-based Goldcorp Inc. (and two other defendants), in a dispute over the ownership of one of South America’s largest gold and copper deposits. Barrick contended that Goldcorp illegally gained control of the Chilean mine that Barrick had conditionally purchased from co-defendant Xstrata Copper Chile S.A.
Superior Court Justice Herman Wilton-Siegel’s 229-page ruling dismissed all of Barrick’s claims against the three defendants. “Barrick’s principal claim for breach of contract is dismissed on the basis that the agreement between Barrick Corp. and Xstrata Chile S.A. terminated upon the exercise of the right of first refusal,” the judge wrote.
Mark Gelowitz of Osler in Toronto, who represents Goldcorp, said the judgment provides a useful overview of the rationale and principles that underlie rights of first refusal (ROFRs) and similar liquidity arrangements in shareholder agreements.