Junior resource investment in a financial meltdown – the Good, the Bad and the Ugly – by Lawrence Williams (Mineweb.com – May 18, 2012)

www.mineweb.com

Rick Rule’s presentation at the New York Hard Assets Conference earlier this week sees some light for the informed junior resource investor despite current patterns which have mostly been Bad or Ugly!

NEW YORK (MINEWEB) – In a highly entertaining keynote address to the New York Hard Assets Investment Conference, Rick Rule of Global Resource Investments, now part of the Sprott Group, who professes to be a contrarian investor presented his views on resource investment in a financial meltdown – a very relevant speech in the current environment when so many resource stocks have been decimated.
 
He divided much of his talk into three categories – The Good, The Bad and the Ugly.
 
So as not to depress people too much at the start of his talk he examined The Good first and said there is much that is Good for the investor.  Primarily he reckons the natural resource bull market remains intact despite the recent poor performance of the markets.    There are very good fundamental reasons for this driven by a dramatic increase in living standards for the poor in the emerging market economies.   As people become more free they become more rich – and the things they buy are made of ‘stuff’, while in the West we are mostly buying what could be termed luxuries rather than ‘stuff’.
 
So as the bottom 2 billion people get more rich they buy more ‘stuff’ which in turn increases demand – and given there was a lack of investment in resources in the previous era supply has had trouble keeping up with this demand and hence prices for the metals and materials which are in demand have been rising.
 
However that is seen as the only Good factor affecting the current markets.  The rest is Bad or downright Ugly.  Take Western Word debt.  In the U.S. alone the debt is around $80 TRILLION.  This year the US is planning to save $500 billion.  Knocking nine zeros off this figure equates to household with $80,000 of debt while the household is saving $500 a year to pay it off.  Clearly silly figures.
 
“It gets worse” said Rule.  The conditions precedent have not been addressed by the administration.  The excesses have not been curtailed so the whole financial imbroglio is likely to occur again.  We are getting no nearer a solution.
 
Liquidity though is high through Quantitative Easing – or ‘counterfeiting’ as Rule puts it, although not much of the money generated through QE is finding its way into the real economy.  Indeed he quoted a friend at a financial institution saying that banks can borrow government money at 195 basis points on the one hand and then lend it to another government backed institution – Fannie May – at 575 basis points which to Rule makes no sense whatsoever.  Banks would much rather do this than lend to anything which could have any degree of risk attached so it’s not surprising the government handouts to banks are not filtering through to where it is needed most.  Much of what went wrong in commodities in 2008 was a lack of credit in the interbank market so short term money to the commodities market was just not available.  Is this going to happen again?  Perhaps not but it is something that people need to be aware of.
 
And then on to the Ugly – particularly with respect to junior mining stocks.  How low can the sector go?
 
For the rest of this article, please go to the Mineweb.com website: http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page67?oid=151674&sn=Detail&pid=102055